When buying new machinery in Great Britain, the equipment must:
Employers need to look at how they want employees to approach their use of machinery, which makes conducting risk assessments so important. As a part of the risk assessment process, employers should look at the hazards that may arise specifically because a machine is being maintained.
Moving parts of machinery must be guarded so that employees are not:
These injuries are more likely to occur if:
Prior to first use, machinery should be risk assessed (what might occur and how). The machine should be complete with all its parts, have all guards fitted, and be free from defects. All guards mean: the physical guards, interlocking guards, two-handed controls, light beam guards, or even pressure-sensitive mats.
The law requires a supplier to provide the right safeguards for the machinery and to inform the buyer of any residual risks that could not be designed out of the machine’s use. This then enables the buyer and the users to be aware of the risks and manage them by other means.
If there are any badly designed safeguards, it is important that they are identified as soon as possible. If they cause inconvenience or are easily overridden, then the employees may stop using them / override them, and in doing so, risk injuring themselves or breaking the law. It is important that these are detected, the reasons determined, and that appropriate action is taken to manage the issue.
The risk assessment should aid in creating safe working procedures which manage the hazards and risks. These procedures need to be included in the training provided to the relevant workforce.
We have a specific template designed to guide the employer through the assessment process where machinery is concerned. This can be found on our H&S Client Portal, or please feel free to contact us for assistance.
There is a hierarchy with regard to guards in use on machinery:
Where controlled by other means (programmable electronic systems), ensure the programming is conducted by a competent person. Also:
Unsafe maintenance has caused many fatalities and serious injuries, either during maintenance itself, or to those using the badly or wrongly maintained/repaired equipment.
It is advisable to follow a scheduled maintenance plan for machinery, not only to facilitate proper planning and allow for a reporting procedure for any issues noticed, but also to minimise the likelihood of unplanned repairs caused by breakdowns (although these can always still occur).
Even with a proactive schedule, maintenance is still classed as a non-routine task and may expose those conducting the maintenance to risk.
PUWER (the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations) requires:
Maintenance should only be carried out by competent people who have been provided with sufficient information, instruction and training (PUWER Regs 8 and 9).
A contractor conducting maintenance should be able to produce a risk assessment which demonstrates the activity they will be conducting. If the maintenance is being conducted in-house, then a risk assessment of the task/activity must be produced. The assessment should also determine if there are any risks that are specific to the maintenance regimen, e.g. running without guards or with interlocks disabled.
Maintenance is best practice, regardless of regulation, because it can determine if critical features of the equipment need replacement, and where deterioration would cause or could exacerbate a risk of harm.
We can provide both Risk Assessment and PUWER Awareness training if your business needs further support on the matters raised in this newsletter. Please click here to see our H&S training brochure for more details.
To avoid accidents, causing harm and facing prosecution,
ensure your business complies with health and safety law in 2025, by
Need help with a Health and Safety matter? Please do not hesitate to contact us.